Side-by-side comparison

CircleCI vs GitHub Actions

Pricing, compliance, integrations, and open source status — drawn from the latest verified data on infraplz.dev. Differences are highlighted so the winner on each row is scannable at a glance.

CircleCI matches or trails on all compared dimensions. GitHub Actions leads on GDPR and a broader integration surface (4 unique).

Overview

Cloud and self-hosted CI/CD with a strong reputation for fast pipelines and config-as-code. Native AI features: AI Test Insights for flaky test detection, ML-driven test splitting, and pipeline anomaly detection. Resource classes from small to GPU. Integrates with every major SCM and cloud, with first-class macOS for iOS builds.

View full profile

GitHub-native CI/CD that runs workflows triggered by repo events. Hosted runners across Linux, macOS, and Windows or self-hosted on your infrastructure. Tight integration with GitHub Copilot for AI-assisted workflow authoring, Copilot Autofix for security findings, and Copilot agentic PR reviews. The default deploy plumbing for any team already on GitHub.

View full profile
Pricing model
Freemium
Freemium
Free tier
Yes
Yes
Open source
No
No
SOC 2
Yes
Yes
HIPAA
No
No
GDPR
No
Yes
FedRAMP
Yes
Yes
GitHub
Yes
Yes
GitLab
Yes
No
Kubernetes
Yes
Yes
Datadog
No
No
PagerDuty
No
No
Slack
Yes
Yes
Terraform
Yes
Yes
AWS
Yes
Yes
GCP
Yes
Yes
Azure
No
Yes
Heartbeat
verified
verified

Related comparisons

Shares a tool